I mean, seriously. What is his problem? The guy is beginning to sound more paranoid than Ann Coulter.
INDIANAPOLIS - In the latest Spygate wrinkle, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., says the NFL is "stonewalling" when it comes to talking to key witness Matt Walsh, a former New England Patriots assistant, ESPN.com reported.
This report comes shortly after NFL commissioner Roger Goodell told reporters that he hopes to meet with Walsh about the tapes he reportedly made of the St. Louis Rams' walkthrough before the 2002 Super Bowl.
“The lawyers are still talking and we’re anxious to speak to him. We’re anxious to get an agreement to get him to come forth.” Goodell told the Associated Press on Wednesday before the start of the NFL combine.
“We hope to be able to talk to him shortly.”
When and if Goodell does talk to Walsh, Specter says he wants to be present. But he's skeptical that will happen.
"My suspicion is that they're going to put enough conditions on it so that he won't talk," Specter told ESPN.com. "If they had wanted Walsh to talk, it would have been done a long time ago. They are not helped by keeping him on ice, unless they intend to [permanently] keep him on ice."
Ok, now, understand that at this point, even the wussy ass Indianapolis Colts-whose brass has bitched more about Belichick and the Patriots and who are responsible for passing more rules with the word "Patriots" stamped across on them than any team in the league-are done with this. Per whiner extraordinaire Bill Polian, who hates the Pats as much as anyone:
“The process was fair, it was detailed it was efficient. What was on the tape was explained to us and what was in the notes was explained to us. The reason that information was done away with was explained to us. From my perspective that was a thorough, fair, efficient process done with a lot of integrity. (The penalty handed down) was appropriate. It’s fair to say that we’re satisfied with the explanation and we’re satisfied with what was done. It’s behind us. It’s time to move forward.”
Everybody else actually connected to the NFL seems willing to build a bridge and get over it, but not Senator Specter, who seems determined to pursue this with a zeal you a) wish the Bush administration had pursued Osama Bin Laden with, b) is strangely reminiscent of the same type of personal, paranoid attacks on Anita Hill Specter engaged in during the Clarence Thomas hearings, and b) was largely absent during the time when Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress and the nation was being plowed under with lies and deceitful practices. Where was Arlen Specter when George Bush was telling us Saddam had WMDs and was part of the 9/11 plot? Where has Specter been on the effort to punish George Bush's repeated rape of the Constitution of the United States? Even when he admits the president broke a law-ie, the warrantless wiretapping flap-he doesn't think the president should be punished, because even the most moderate Republicans are all about the party:
"Specter, speaking in general terms, noted that impeachment and criminal prosecution are possibilities in the event a president acted unconstitutionally. But Specter added: "I don't see any talk about impeachment here. I don't think anyone doubts the president is making a good-faith effort. He's acting in a way that he feels he must."
So, it's ok if the president violates the constitution and spys on you and me-as long as he "feels he must" (and does that excuse the serial murderer from his crimes as long as he expressed that he "felt he must?"), we'll give him a pass, but it's not ok if an NFL team breaks no laws and spies on other teams, who expect to be spyed on? Is that not the most absurd thing you have ever heard?
No, actually, it's probably just as absurd that Specter is foaming at the mouth over Spygate but thinks the telecoms should be given blanket immunity for breaking the law and helping the president spy on us:
Now there are lawsuits pending, and I think that it is true that the telephone companies have been good citizens in this whole matter. They ought not to be held responsible.
In other words, they were just following orders. As I recall, that defense didn't work at Nuremberg, Sen. Specter, although it explains why Specter seems to think the NFL should just give Matt Walsh blanket immunity no matter what he says. He was just a good foot soldier, after all.
I could go on but I think you get the point here. Sen. Specter's righteous indignation seems contrived and out of place, curiously targeted at sexually harassed staffers of powerful men and football teams accused of violating an ambiguous league rule. While the true perpetrators of fraud and injustice on the American people wend their way merrily into history with nary a slap on the wrist, the senior senator from Pennsylvania seems determined not to be remembered as a tireless defender of our civil liberties and way of life but as the Guy Who Took On Big Football.
Whatever. Wear it with pride, Senator.